计算化学公社

标题: 一篇关于DFT的tutorial review Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2020; e26332. [打印本页]

作者
Author:
yflchx    时间: 2020-6-28 21:32
标题: 一篇关于DFT的tutorial review Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2020; e26332.
P. Morgante, R. Peverati, The devil in the details: A tutorial review on some undervalued aspects of density functional theory calculations. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2020; e26332.

https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.26332

一篇关于DFT的tutorial review。


作者
Author:
ymygca    时间: 2020-6-29 03:01
(, 下载次数 Times of downloads: 54)
作者
Author:
sobereva    时间: 2020-6-29 03:30
看了一遍,感觉此文中有价值的信息非常有限(也就是图1可以以后用在别的地方),在SI里对计算耗时的对比非常有误导性,居然很多例子里B3LYP耗时比M06-2X还高。整篇文章基本只涉及热化学数据计算,而激发态、响应属性等等一概没提,相对来说这个标题起得太大了。看完后的感觉是,内行人看了有不少槽想吐,而初学者看了,容易被SI里的信息带偏,还是没法正确认识该怎么计算、怎么合理选择计算级别。
作者
Author:
yflchx    时间: 2020-6-29 09:47
sobereva 发表于 2020-6-29 03:30
看了一遍,感觉此文中有价值的信息非常有限(也就是图1可以以后用在别的地方),在SI里对计算耗时的对比非 ...

怎么计算,怎么合理选择计算级别:
作者的说法:
“• Always follow recommendations from experts in the field when choosing any combination of functional and basis sets.
• Avoid picking a functional/basis set only because they are popular.
• The best way to pick a functional is to compare the chemical problem under consideration with similar problems collected in databases of high-level computational data. Databases can also give an indication on the expected accuracy of the results (i.e., estimate the error bars associated with a calculation).
• Basis sets are responsible for two types of errors—BSIE and BSSE. Both errors can be alleviated by choosing a suitably large basis set and, in some specific situations, by using appropriate techniques (CP corrections).
• Do not use B3LYP/6-31G* blindly. It cannot be universally trusted.”


作者
Author:
yflchx    时间: 2020-6-29 16:11
补一篇参照:

Lars Goerigk and Nisha Mehta, A Trip to the Density Functional Theory Zoo: Warnings and Recommendations for the User.

Australian Journal of Chemistry 72(8), 563-573.  https://doi.org/10.1071/CH19023
作者
Author:
naonao5205    时间: 2020-6-29 17:46
Lars Goerigk and Nisha Mehta, A Trip to the Density Functional Theory Zoo: Warnings and Recommendations for the User.
作者
Author:
sobereva    时间: 2020-6-29 21:07

作者
Author:
yflchx    时间: 2020-6-29 22:26
sobereva 发表于 2020-6-29 21:07
**** 本内容被作者隐藏 ****

特定的人有特定的倾向,批判着看。

两厢对比就能感觉到倾向性,这也是我发这个参照文献的原因。

对任何形式的泛函推荐已经不太关注,更关心所谓高精度泛函的缺陷和反例。




欢迎光临 计算化学公社 (http://bbs.keinsci.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3