看到一篇文章中关于IP和EA的表述我感觉是错的，作者说“It is found that either the vertical ionization energy or adiabatic ionization energy of free corannulene is larger than those of free C70, indicating that either the electron-denoting or electron-accepting of C70 is stronger than corannulene in their isolated state.”首先，electron-accepting是和EA的值挂钩吧，但是这里却说“vertical ionization energy or adiabatic ionization energy of free corannulene is larger ”；其次，这里改为电子亲和能EA表述也有问题吧：对于corannulene来说，不论是绝热还是垂直IP和EA均大于C70，这意味着C70更容易给出电子，也就是electron-denoting of C70 is stronger than corannulene，但是二者的EA都是负的，很显然都不能结合电子。其次EA若均为正，但是EA越大，不说明越容易得到电子吗，也就是electron-accepting of C70 is lower than corannulene，但作者却说electron-accepting of C70 is stronger than corannulene 。文章为：RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 27960–27968
作者Author: chemhou 时间: 2022-10-13 20:31
EA部分是错的 https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/formula?ID=C135105587&Mask=20作者Author: 七尺贱 时间: 2022-10-14 15:14