计算化学公社
标题:
VASP计算负载钒的TiO2slab吸附二氯苯时,吸附能过大且无法完成吸附
[打印本页]
作者Author:
zjujam
时间:
2023-3-18 20:43
标题:
VASP计算负载钒的TiO2slab吸附二氯苯时,吸附能过大且无法完成吸附
本帖最后由 zjujam 于 2023-3-18 20:43 编辑
各位老师和学友们
1、吸附的分子是二氯苯分子,经过优化后的能量为:-73.737593 eV
2、吸附的slab是二氧化钛上面负载了桥位钒氧结构,经过结构优化后的能量为:-1739.3373 eV
3、吸附后的体系的能量为:-1834.288 eV,吸附位点为L算位点
4、计算得到的吸附能(未矫正):-21.2 eV
吸附能明显不符合常理,二氯苯分子远离吸附位点,距离大约为3 A。 参考文献的吸附能为0.2eV- 2eV 之间,请问一下老师和同学,大概是哪些地方出问题了吗?
目前试过的排查:
1、增加了IVDW=11,无明显变化
2、限制了 POTIM=0.15,无明显变化
3、切换吸附角度,虽然吸附能有所下降,但仍为-19 eV,高出一个量级
4、增大真空层,吸附能无明显变化
5、增加了偶极矫正 LDIPOL=T IDIPOL=3,吸附能仍为20eV量级
6、对比了另外的B酸位点的吸附,吸附能也高出了一个量级
7、尝试了运用{001}晶面进行建模,吸附能也为20eV量级
备注:slab的优化过程为:nanatase-TiO2单点优化——切面,然后优化——扩胞,固定下面两层+负载V-O-V,然后优化
总原子数为201
以下是DCB分子结构优化、slab优化和吸附优化的INCAR数据,优化步骤都是采用分级优化,K点选择均为初级优化:111,高级优化331
(1)DCB-INCAR:
Global Parameters
ISTART = 0 (Read existing wavefunction; if there)
ISPIN = 2 (Non-Spin polarised DFT)
ICHARG = 2 (Non-self-consistent: GGA/LDA band structures)
LREAL = Auto (Projection operators: automatic)
ENCUT = 400 (Cut-off energy for plane wave basis set, in eV)
PREC = Normal (Precision level)
ALGO = N
NCORE = 16
KPAR = 2 (Divides k-grid into separate groups)
Electronic Relaxation
ISMEAR = 0 (Gaussian smearing; metals:1)
SIGMA = 0.02 (Smearing value in eV; metals:0.2)
NELM = 80 (Max electronic SCF steps)
EDIFF = 1E-5 (SCF energy convergence; in eV)
IVDW = 11
Ionic Relaxation
NSW = 400 (Max ionic steps)
IBRION = 2 (Algorithm: 0-MD; 1-Quasi-New; 2-CG)
ISIF = 3 (Stress/relaxation: 2-Ions, 3-Shape/Ions/V, 4-Shape/Ions)
EDIFFG = -0.02 (Ionic convergence; eV/AA)
(2)slab-INCAR
Global Parameters
ISTART = 0 (Read existing wavefunction; if there)
ISPIN = 2 (Non-Spin polarised DFT)
ICHARG = 2 (Non-self-consistent: GGA/LDA band structures)
LREAL = Auto (Projection operators: automatic)
ENCUT = 400 (Cut-off energy for plane wave basis set, in eV)
PREC = N (Precision level)
ALGO = N
NCORE = 16
KPAR = 2 (Divides k-grid into separate groups)
Electronic Relaxation
ISMEAR = 0 (Gaussian smearing; metals:1)
SIGMA = 0.05 (Smearing value in eV; metals:0.2)
NELM = 80 (Max electronic SCF steps)
EDIFF = 1E-5 (SCF energy convergence; in eV)
Ionic Relaxation
NSW = 400 (Max ionic steps)
IBRION = 2 (Algorithm: 0-MD; 1-Quasi-New; 2-CG)
ISIF = 2 (Stress/relaxation: 2-Ions, 3-Shape/Ions/V, 4-Shape/Ions)
EDIFFG = -0.02 (Ionic convergence; eV/AA)
(3)slab+DCB-INCAR:
Global Parameters
ISTART = 0 (Read existing wavefunction; if there)
ISPIN = 2 (Non-Spin polarised DFT)
ICHARG = 2 (Non-self-consistent: GGA/LDA band structures)
LREAL = Auto (Projection operators: automatic)
ENCUT = 400 (Cut-off energy for plane wave basis set, in eV)
PREC = N (Precision level)
ALGO = N
NCORE = 16
KPAR = 2 (Divides k-grid into separate groups)
Electronic Relaxation
ISMEAR = 0 (Gaussian smearing; metals:1)
SIGMA = 0.05 (Smearing value in eV; metals:0.2)
NELM = 80 (Max electronic SCF steps)
EDIFF = 1E-5 (SCF energy convergence; in eV)
IVDW = 11
POTIM = 0.15
Ionic Relaxation
NSW = 400 (Max ionic steps)
IBRION = 2 (Algorithm: 0-MD; 1-Quasi-New; 2-CG)
ISIF = 2 (Stress/relaxation: 2-Ions, 3-Shape/Ions/V, 4-Shape/Ions)
EDIFFG = -0.02 (Ionic convergence; eV/AA)
作者Author:
zjujam
时间:
2023-3-18 20:43
请各位老师和同学帮忙看看,给个思路,在此谢过了!
作者Author:
zjujam
时间:
2023-3-18 20:43
问题解决了,在于slab 和吸附模型的晶胞大小不同。导致最终的吸附能不同。
新的问题又出现了,类似这样的模型,晶胞大小相同,优化的参数一样,最后还是吸附能达到接近-17eV量级,请问各位有什么排查建议吗?
作者Author:
含光君
时间:
2023-3-18 21:00
附件中三个结构的计算显然不是同一组k点下进行的。
计算时不光要保持晶胞参数一致,k点选择也是。出现这样的问题还说明没有对该结构的k点进行收敛性测试。
作者Author:
zjujam
时间:
2023-3-18 21:11
含光君 发表于 2023-3-18 21:00
附件中三个结构的计算显然不是同一组k点下进行的。
计算时不光要保持晶胞参数一致,k点选择也是。出现这 ...
老师您好,附件中KPOINTS文件有些不同,这是因为发上来的是不是最终优化精度的文件,最后K点的选择都是3*3*1。 感谢您的建议,二氯苯分子后面算了下,也采用了331,最终能量是要低0.2eV
关于K点收敛测试,确实没有进行,都是先111,然后高等精度优化的时候为331.后续我将进行测试,谢谢!
欢迎光临 计算化学公社 (http://bbs.keinsci.com/)
Powered by Discuz! X3.3