计算化学公社

标题: {芳香性} 为何用NICS比较单环芳香性要谨慎? [打印本页]

作者
Author:
Hugo_314cat    时间: 3 hour ago
标题: {芳香性} 为何用NICS比较单环芳香性要谨慎?
本帖最后由 Hugo_314cat 于 2026-3-5 15:53 编辑

{Aromaticity} Why is Caution Needed When Using NICS to Compare Monocyclic Aromaticity?

NICS是现存评判芳香性方法中最流行、靠谱度较高的几个方法之一,然而使用NICS对比不同大小的环系的时候却有潜在隐患,本贴将简述该隐患。
NICS is one of the most popular and reliable methods currently available for evaluating aromaticity. However, there are potential pitfalls when using NICS to compare ring systems of different sizes. This post intends to outline this issue.

More about NICS:
衡量芳香性的方法以及在Multiwfn中的计算 - 思想家公社的门口:量子化学·分子模拟·二次元
NICS(1)与NICS(-1) - 波函数分析与Multiwfn (Wavefunction Analysis & Multiwfn) - 计算化学公社

引用声明:本文全部内容均来自最后引用文献的Supplementary Materials部分。
Citation statement: All contents of this blog are cited from the Supplementary Materials of the preprint shown at the bottom.

假设一个理想环形势场的环半径为r。那么,它的第一能级是角量子数L=0的,而它的第二、第三能级是角量子数|L|=1的(J. Chem. Educ. 2022, 99, 10, 3497–3501)。
也就是说,对于一个轨道而言,它的角动量(也就是磁矩)是存在上限值的。为方便理解,这里直接假设它的总环电流的磁矩为μ。
那么,环中心点的磁感应强度就是:
(, 下载次数 Times of downloads: 0)
这个B值是正比于NICS的。这也就是说,当环电流磁矩一致时,NICS值是大致与r^3成反比的。
进一步可以证明电流密度大致与r^4成反比。
一个简单但极端的例子是苯和硅苯(Si6H6)。如果计算这两个分子HOMO的轨道角动量,可以发现硅苯HOMO的轨道角动量甚至比苯要稍大一些。然而如果使用NICS和电流密度等判据,大家都会把硅苯归类为弱芳香性物种,因为对它而言不论是环电流还是NICS都太小了。硅苯和苯的键长比约为0.63,可估算其HOMO所产生的NICS比为0.25,环电流密度比为0.16,差距还是非常明显的。

Assuming an ideal circular potential field with a ring radius of r, its first energy level corresponds to the angular quantum number L=0, while its second and third energy levels correspond to ∣L∣=1 (J. Chem. Educ. 2022, 99, 10, 3497–3501).
This means that for an orbital, its angular momentum (also the magnetic moment) has a theoretical upper limit. For ease of understanding, let us directly assume here that the total magnetic moment of the ring current is μ.
Then, the magnetic induction intensity at a point on the centre of the ring is:

This B value is proportional to NICS. In other words, for a consistent magnetic moment of the ring current, the NICS value is approximately inversely proportional to r^3.
It can further be demonstrated that the current density is approximately inversely proportional to r^4.
A simple but extreme example is benzene and silicobenzene (Si₆H₆). If one calculates the orbital angular momentum of the HOMOs of these two molecules, it can be found that the orbital angular momentum of the HOMO of silicobenzene is even larger than that of benzene. However, using criteria such as NICS and current density, silicobenzene is commonly classified as a weak-aromatic species, because both its ring current and NICS value are too small. The bond length ratio between silicobenzene and benzene is approximately 0.63. It can be estimated that the NICS ratio generated by their HOMOs is 0.25, and the ring current density ratio is 0.16—a very significant difference.

我们或许应该用轨道角动量而不是用磁感应强度与电流强度来衡量芳香性?
Perhaps we should measure aromaticity using orbital angular momentum rather than magnetic induction intensity and current density?

若您在您的工作中应用了本文所引用的讨论内容,暂时请引用下文:
If the discussion cited in this article is applied in your work, please cite the following preprint (temporarily):

doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-z5lf6/v4  











欢迎光临 计算化学公社 (http://bbs.keinsci.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3