Christ 发表于 2023-11-30 01:27
It's really an interesting study, similar to what I'm doing now, that's why I'd like to ask for help ...

if you try doing QM/MM what the professor suggest I think is the best option, for just QM of the pocket I'm not pretty sure which can be the best method.

It's really an interesting study, similar to what I'm doing now, that's why I'd like to ask for help here.

My project is about the catalysis of ATP in a kinase pocket, and I'd like to observe in a kinase which residue contributes more to the phosphorylation, and which kinase could perform the phosphorylation with a lower energy barrier. I'd like to ask for a potential basis set for it.

As a fresh in the Gassuian, maybe my question is naive, I'm sorry for wasting your time and looking forward to your invaluable reply! Thanks

sobereva 发表于 2021-8-31 00:30
You can use basis set as regular quantum chemistry studies. However, considering that QM/MM MD nee ...

Thanks

rpestana94 发表于 2021-8-30 22:46
Thanks, in the case of trying to do a QM/MM is there any post from you about considering what to u ...

You can use basis set as regular quantum chemistry studies. However, considering that QM/MM MD needs to calculate a large number of frames, so the employed basis set should not be too large. Usually 6-31G* and def2-SV(P) are inexpensive and acceptable choices.

sobereva 发表于 2021-8-28 01:40
QM/MM is not needed if you are not interested in phosphorylation reaction. To study how phosphorylat ...

Thanks, in the case of trying to do a QM/MM is there any post from you about considering what to use?

I think, not sure, usually, when people use QM/MM approach, the basis set is lower than using QM alone, I assume for the number of atoms when we use QM are really small molecules.

QM/MM is not needed if you are not interested in phosphorylation reaction. To study how phosphorylation changes the protein conformation, you can simply mutate the native protein and then conduct standard MD simulation to observe the change in conformation.