sobereva 发表于 2024-5-13 22:25 谢谢老师解答 |
zhangfaxue 发表于 2024-5-13 21:29 verlet情况的bug所致(在我来看是bug),之前论坛里我就回答过类似问题 |
zhangfaxue 发表于 2024-5-13 21:12 把rlist设成和rcoulomb/rvdw相同的值 |
sobereva 发表于 2024-5-10 23:43 老师还有一个问题需要请教,我的A为带COOH的分子,B为阳离子,他们的库伦相互作用我理解应该是负的表现为吸引力,但是为什么我算出来是正,是我renrun.mdp文件设置有问题还是和什么相关? |
sobereva 发表于 2024-5-10 23:43 老师我用cutoff-scheme = group,提示Fatal error:rcoulomb must not be greater than rlist (twin-range schemes are not supported) 然后逐渐减小rcoulomb和rvdw直到rcoulomb=0.8,rvdw=0.8(都小于1)提示 NOTE 1 【file rerun2.mdp]:The group cutoff scheme is deprecated since GRoMAcs 5.0 and will beremoved in a future release when all interaction forms are supported forthe verlet scheme. The verlet scheme already scales better, and it iscompatible with GPUs and other accelerators NOTE 2 file rerun2.mdp]: For a correct single-point energy evaluation with nsteps = 0, usecontinuation =yes to avoid constraining the input coordinates. ERROR 1 [file rerun2.mdp]:With coulombtype = Cut-off, rcoulomb should be >= rlist unless you use apotential modifier ERROR 2lfile rerun2.mdp]:With vdwtype = cut-off, rvdw must be >= rlist unless you use a potentialmodifier NOTE 3 「file rerun2.mdp]:You are using a cut-off for Vdw interactions with NVE, for good energyconservation usevdwtype=shift(possibly with Dispcorr) NOTE 4 [file rerun2.mdp]:You are using a cut-off for electrostatics with NVE, for good energyconservation use coulombtype=PME-Switch or Reaction-Field-zero 求助老师使用cutoff-scheme = group应该怎么确定rvdw和rcoulomb |
| 用cutoff-scheme = group |
手机版 Mobile version|北京科音自然科学研究中心 Beijing Kein Research Center for Natural Sciences|京公网安备 11010502035419号|计算化学公社 — 北京科音旗下高水平计算化学交流论坛 ( 京ICP备14038949号-1 )|网站地图
GMT+8, 2026-2-23 14:53 , Processed in 0.175964 second(s), 25 queries , Gzip On.