|
对于一审稿意见模糊,特求助各位。
意见如下In the paper, the author speculated that the hole transport performance is better than the electron transport performance due to the good HOMO delocalization. But in the later, they compared the molecular orbital between Spiro-F2 and F3. They pointed that the hole transport performance of F3, of which HOMO is more localized as shown in the figure, is better than F2 since the interaction of branched chain dominates the hole coupling energy. According to this point, it is suspected that the localization of LUMO in the molecular center region is also helpful to the electron transport performance. Two corollaries are opposite to each other(红色部分是审稿人的话,并非文章内容).(对于这条意见我没有明白审稿人的意思,我全文都在讨论空穴输运没有涉及到电子输运性质)
In addition, the author should provide more reliable evidence that can prove the relationship between the molecular orbital and the charge transport performance.(对于这条我是否可以说:Good HOMO delocalization is favourable for increasing HOMO-HOMO overlap of adiacent molecules in crystal structure or dimers, thereby strengthen hole transfer integral from site energy correction model)
多谢各位!!!
|
|