LiHuaYu 发表于 2024-3-23 21:01
Entropy is no more consistent with entropy calculated by Gaussian. Not sure why?
sobereva 发表于 2024-3-23 21:32
Shermo by default uses QRRHO model, which is much better than RRHO used in Gaussian when there are ...
LiHuaYu 发表于 2024-3-23 22:44
Version 2.3.6 gives exact entropy values as in Gaussian outputs. I wonder if there is an option to ...
经常有Shermo的用户问为什么Shermo算的热力学校正量和Gaussian输出的不一致,在此专门说一下。要想Shermo输出的热力学校正量和Gaussian直接输出的严格一致,Shermo的settings.ini里的设定必须满足:
• T=和P=分别与Gaussian计算时设的温度和压力一致(Gaussian默认的情况相当于T= 298.15、P= 1.0)
• 频率校正因子和Gaussian设的一致(如果Gaussian计算时没用scale关键词指定,则sclZPE、sclheat、sclS都应当为1.0)
• 热力学量计算模型和Gaussian一致。Gaussian用的是RRHO模型,对应于ilowfreq= 0
如果以上都满足,结果还不一致,且体系结构有对称性,大概率是Gaussian的振动分析部分的代码对体系的点群判断有误,导致转动对称数判断不对,进而导致算出的转动对热力学校正量的贡献错误。而Shermo判断点群的功能明显更稳健,不一致的情况一律以Shermo为准(有多次用户问我此问题的时候我最后都发现俩程序对点群判断不一致,每次都是Shermo是正确的而Gaussian是错误的。可能是Gaussian判断点群的阈值过于严格)。
sobereva 发表于 2024-3-24 11:05
使用Shermo结合量子化学程序方便地计算分子的各种热力学数据
http://sobereva.com/552(http://bbs.kein ...
LiHuaYu 发表于 2024-3-24 12:33
Here, most of the parameters are the same and were used for two version 2.3.6 and 2.6. Total entro ...
sobereva 发表于 2024-3-25 11:14
There results based on Grimme's QRRHO using Shermo 2.3.6 and 2.6 are completely the same, using ex ...
LiHuaYu 发表于 2024-3-25 15:34
I did more tests and found that in some cases total entropy is similar, but some are not. Attached ...
Warning: settings.ini cannot be found in either current folder or the directory defined by Shermopath environment, thus default parameters are used!
sobereva 发表于 2024-3-26 00:54
The difference is clear from the output:
2.3.6
funyboy 发表于 2024-11-28 23:33
sob老师,我有个困惑,我用Gaussian计算时编写gjf文件用了--Link1--方式实现了多步计算,1、优化及振动分析 ...
sobereva 发表于 2024-11-28 23:40
手动删掉前面的,只剩最后一个internal job的信息
sobereva 发表于 2024-11-28 23:40
手动删掉前面的,只剩最后一个internal job的信息
funyboy 发表于 2024-11-29 00:34
老师,我再问一个问题,shermo读取的结果
out文件结果:
欢迎光临 计算化学公社 (http://bbs.keinsci.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |