|
本帖最后由 flyingchow 于 2022-4-11 09:49 编辑
我们计算化学课上老师留的作业有一题是这样的:Compute the equilibrium bond length for hydrogen fluoride using STO-3G basis set. For the fluorine basis set, only include the 2s and 2pz (direct along the H-F bond axis) orbitals.
In the determination of total energy, use the following orbital energies for the unaltered 1s, 2px and 2py orbitals; energy(1s) = -25.9508 h, energy(2px)=energy(2pz)=-0.4809 h.
The energy and optimal bond length using full STO-3G basis set are -98.5728 h and 0.955 Angstrom respectively.
How do your results differ from those determined using the full STO-3G basis and briefly explain the origin of the difference?
这道题目应该是让我们就仅仅用H1s,F2s,F2pz三个STO-3g的basis function来进行计算,得到3*3的S,T,V,还有3*3*3*3的双电子积分,然后用同样的方法构建Fock矩阵,初猜系数矩阵,然后SCF得到结果。
我想问的是:
full STO-3G的结果,计算化学软件一秒钟就得到了;那计算化学软件可以算这种挑出几个轨道的SCF吗?
我们老师让我们用mathematica或者python半自动手撕,我也做出一个答案来了,但是还是想用现有的软件包来验证一下。
有知道怎么操作的老师能给点提示吗? Gaussian,Orca, Pyscf都行,谢谢了!
|
|