|
Please clarify your concerns - what is a "mistake", in your opinion, that is distinct from some acceptable approximation and needs to be avoided? Indeed the real-life polymer is macroscopic and non-periodic, and of course using it directly for theoretical computation is not possible due to its sheer scale. It is only possible to work with a scaled-down microscopic model system and hope it is representative enough to capture the key features of the polymer. Your choice is building it either as (1) an isolated, non-periodic, cluster-like system of finite size, or (2) a periodic, condensed-phase-like system represented by some unit cell, also of finite size; in either case there is a balance between (a) sufficient size to avoid significant boundary/surface effect, and (b) feasible size within capabilities of limited computational resource. Speaking of which, do you have a sense about the spatial and temporal magnitude that varioud methods (DFT, classical force fields, etc) can deal with? |
|